Legal
Years of files that answer questions, without a record leaving the firm.
Firms holding privileged and confidential information, where the product is expertise and billable time and both are being lost to work that never needed a lawyer.
What we hear from organizations like yours.
- "Associates spend hours finding what the firm already knows"
- "Nobody can use the public tools with client matters"
- "Intake and conflicts are handled by hand"
- "Document review is where the margin goes"
- "Institutional knowledge leaves with every partner who retires"
Where we usually start.
The assessment decides which comes first, on the evidence. These are the areas that usually apply.
What an engagement looks like.
Illustrative, not delivered work. The shape of a typical first engagement, so you can picture it before the assessment.
A private model on hardware in the firm, indexed against past matters and work product, that answers questions with the source document. Then intake and document assembly workflows inside the existing case management system.
What makes this sector different.
Privilege and confidentiality are not settings. A public model that trains on what it is given, or a vendor that can be subpoenaed for your data, is not an option. The firm has to be able to say exactly where every client record lives and who can see it, and the answer has to be the firm.
Regulated data
Everything can stay on hardware you control.
A private model in your building, on your network, with every record's location written down for the auditor, and the agreements that govern the data in place before work begins.